Dear Reader,
Picture this: Girish as a child was a very
obedient boy. He always did what mom asked, kept his cupboard clean, no
complaints from school. He was the blue-eyed boy of his teachers as he did
homework on time and played no pranks ever.
In college, he attended all classes and
made copious notes. The notes earned him peer approval when he shared them with
those who missed the classes.
All his actions were governed by an intense
need to please everyone, seek approval, be accepted, included and appreciated.
He had a fear of being rejected or left alone.
He found it very difficult to say NO, as he
could not handle NO. He attempted to fulfil everyone’s request even at the cost
of his own happiness and priorities. He could not ask for help instead silently
hoping that others would guess what he wants and offer him that.
In professional life, he worked hard,
pursued excellence and was a do-gooder. He was reasonably popular but wanted
more. When his juniors failed, he would complete their job instead of holding
them accountable as he did not want to hurt their feelings.
To please, appease or seek peace, he would
avoid all confrontations. Artificial harmony was given a preference over
constructive conflict. Whenever voices were raised in an argument around him,
he would consider it his responsibility to pour water over fire and restore
peace at the earliest.
In discussions, he would avoid stating
contrary opinions. When someone else stated an opinion matching with his own,
he would quickly second it. Else Girish would keep silent and later berate
himself “Why did I not speak up?”. Due to unexpressed disagreement, he would
remain resentful of his inability to assert and jealous of others who asserted
authority.
We call this behaviour style – Doormat
Giver (DG). Inability to say no, giving more than you get, sacrificing self,
not speaking up when you have a contrary opinion…
I can relate a lot to this behaviour as my
own life journey has been similar. In one of my business ventures I had 2
assertive partners. When they expressed their opinion, I would agree, despite
my internal disagreement.
I equated disagreement = hurting /
upsetting them = ruining the relationship
The company never grew since we were a
misaligned team with my superficial acceptance of my partners’ views. I blamed
it on them but when I look back, I feel my DG behaviour tantamounted to
sabotage. If my partners knew my internal disagreement, they would find another
rationale to convince me or an alternate approach to which all could agree. The
team counted on my agreement, while I internally checked out. I ended up
spoiling the very relationship which I was protecting by not speaking my mind.
It is critical for self or any team to tune
“Giver” behaviour from Doormat Giver to a Contributor who includes own needs.
Three ways to tune DG behaviour
1. Recognising that DG behaviour leads to burnout for self, diluted
ownership of others, being taken for granted, ultimately resentment and finally
failure of the project / relationship.
2. Shift focus outside self. Change the objective of the ‘Giving’
behaviour from ‘My inability to say no’ to ‘progress of the overall project’
3. Differentiate between requests & order. Request implies a choice
to say yes or no. Stop equating No to rejection. Choosing ‘NO’ (by either
party) is not a reflection of who you are or the quality of your relationship.
Warm
regards,
Rohan
No comments:
Post a Comment